David Bentley with a 52.5" from Lake Vermillion, MN 2000
Click here to Enlarge.
Issac.24lb Pike.
WORLD RECORD MUSKY
MUSKIE HISTORY
Louie Spray's Muskie Reinstated As World's Biggest
By John Dettloff
On Aug. 6, 1992, Art Lawton's world record Muskie, originally thought to have been 69 pounds, 15 ounces and 64 1/2 inches long, was discovered to have been falsified (greatly exaggerated in size) and was officially disqualified jointly by both the National Freshwater Fishing Hall of Fame and the IGFA.
As a consequence of that decision, Louie Spray officially was reinstated as the all-tackle world record holder of the Muskie with his 69-pound, 11-ounce fish that he caught out of the Chippewa Flowage in 1949.
Recapping what let to this bombshell discovery: in August 1991, some very contradictory facts about the Lawton Muskie became known to me and, since so many anglers in the Muskie fishing community have always questioned the legitimacy of his fish, I began to deeply research the matter. My goal was to neither prove or disprove the Lawton Muskie, but to learn all of the facts about his fish with a commitment to the ascertainment of the truth.
In summary, the Lawton fish was disqualified because it was discovered that Art Lawton had submitted false evidence to Field O Stream (the record-keeping body at the time) supporting his world record Muskie. It was discovered that: the photo he submitted to Field & Stream as being of his 69-pound, 15-ounce Muskie actually was the photo of a much smaller Muskie of 491/2 inches and 55 pounds and that the weigh-in affidavit Lawton submitted was false evidence. The principle weight witnessed had recanted his original story.
Among the preponderance of evidence discovered proving the fish to have been falsified, the key piece of the whole affair rested upon a newly discovered photo of the Lawton Muskie, showing the fish hanging from a post, clearly showing the true size of the fish. The photo shows the Muskie to be approximately a foot shorter than Art Lawton's own height -- and not a mere 31/2 inches shorter as claimed by Lawton, who was 68 " tall. Some individuals have made the petty, and unfounded accusations that the National Freshwater Fishing Hall of Fame disqualified the Lawton Muskie in an effort to "bring the record back home to Wisconsin." But to anyone knowing the facts, this easily can be dispelled. The fact is, the decision to disqualify Lawton's fish was not made by a handful of "Hayward people," but by a world board of approximately 40 Advisory Governors made up of people from all over the United States, Canada and even abroad. These people voted overwhelmingly to disqualify the Lawton Muskie solely because the facts indisputably prove the Lawton fish to have been falsified. So, history is once again back on its correct course and the mark to bet is set. It only takes time on the water and that one charmed cast to catapult you into the record books to attain that hallowed title that Louis Spray now holds with the largest Muskie ever caught in history - his 69-pound, 11-ounce catch from the Chippewa Flowage.
The Chippewa Flowage is the home of 17 current world record fish, 24 of which are Muskies which include the current all-tackle world record Muskie.
Thanks for dropping by and taking a look at our gallery. Please get in touch with any comments or reactions!
By: Gord Ellis
Some angling myths just won't go away. "Brook trout never bite after a lightning storm" is a personal favourite, but one of the most outlandish is that a deeply hooked fish will survive "because the hook will dissolve in a day or two."
In the muskie-fishing world a debate has raged for years over the ethics of a simple, yet effective, fall technique used on both sides of the border. You place a big single hook in the nose of a sucker, usually over a foot long, and allow it to swim freely on a long line in deep water. Muskie that grab the sucker are allowed to swallow it, usually for about 30 minutes, before the hook is set. Many large muskie are taken this way and, increasingly, released.
Proponents rely on the dissolving-hook theory to rationalize the use of single-hook sucker rigs, but other anglers question whether any fish could survive having a huge hook ripped into its stomach. It's an important question, especially in light of Ontario's move to maximum muskie size limits so that many more fish are released to spawn and grow larger.
In Wisconsin, alone up to 2,000 legal-size muskie are caught on single-hook sucker rigs each year. In 1998, the Chippewa Flowage Musky Study took a step towards answering questions about mortality of fish caught on sucker rigs.
In the study's first year, 47 muskie were caught, nine of which were hooked deeply on sucker rigs, and radio-tagged. Of the nine, due to injuries from swallowing the hook, four died and were recovered by the research team. The fate of the other five muskie is unknown, but they were alive when batteries on the short-term transmitters quit. A muskie caught on a jerkbait as part of the study died later and was also recovered. An autopsy revealed a single hook in its belly. However, 33 muskie caught on artificial baits and then released had a 100 per cent survival rate. This surprised even the most optimistic of Wisconsin's muskie hunters. (Five other tagged muskie were netted, not angled, and were alive when their transmitters died.)
In 1999, the Lac Courte Oreilles tribe, the group that funded the original study, decided not to continue tagging muskie caught by sucker rigs. However, Wisconsin guide John Dettloff was concerned about the four dead fish from the previous year. He felt the results from the study left room for doubt. He wanted to prove conclusively that single-hook sucker rigs did or did not kill muskie that were released. Dettloff raised $5,000, thanks to grants from the Hayward Lakes and the South of the Border Chapter of Muskies Inc., to continue radio-tagging deeply hooked fish.
In fall 1999, Dettloff's study team caught 14 muskie on single-hook sucker rigs. This time, radio transmitters fixed to the fish had a battery life of at least 400 days, with the potential of going 600 days. Three of the tagged muskie died fairly quickly when released.
In spring 2000, Dettloff and his team began tracking the remaining fish. The news was not good. "By late May at least half of the tagged fish were dead," said Dettloff. "There were about four or five of them still moving around, but...by July they were all dead." Using an underwater camera, Dettloff and his team located several of the fatalities on the lake bottom. Two others washed up on shore and bears dragged them into the bush.
Anglers caught two of the tagged muskie early in 2000. A 34-incher (86 cm) was released by an angler who noticed it was tagged. "That fish looked okay, but was a little on the thin side," said Dettloff. " It ended up dying about a month and a half later." The other muskie was a 42-inch (106-cm) beauty, which Dettloff said weighed about 21 pounds (9.5 kg) when tagged in 1999. When re-caught July 4, 2000, it was emaciated. Although released, it died two weeks later. Dettloff said, "We knew (gut-hooked muskie) were dying, but we hadn't had a chance to see a live fish and observe its health. That fish was as skinny as a rail."
The deaths of those 14 muskie - 100 per cent delayed mortality - convinced him the single-hook sucker rig has no place in an ethical angler's bag of tricks.
"On some lakes, you may have as many as 100 fish per year being caught and released on sucker rigs, because people think they're surviving," said Dettloff. "Usually when we tell people about these results, they quit using the single hooks immediately.
"I'm an old-school muskie angler," said Dettloff. "I used single-hook sucker rigs for years and hooked many record-class-sized fish on them. So I was shocked to discover the reality of this method. I've quit using it forever."
Unfortunately, there are few effective alternatives to the standard single-hook rig when you fish suckers. Circle hooks, designed originally for large saltwater fish like halibut, have become the rage among some muskie anglers. But Dettloff says circle hooks are not what they're cracked up to be. "What we've found...is that it's a very poor way of hooking a fish. The fish swallows the bait and then you slowly reel and hope that the hook finds lip on the way out. Most of the time the hook doesn't catch and you lose the darn thing. Of the ones you do catch, some are gut hooked. So there really is no benefit to using circle hooks."
Although Dettloff claims not to be a big fan of quick-strike rigs, he says they're the best option for live-bait muskie anglers. "The minute you get a bite, you set the hook," he said. You don't gut-hook the fish.
Some anglers believe the extra hardware on quick-strike rigs (usually a single hook and a treble on a leader) scares off muskie and causes the sucker to die sooner. But Dettloff says a quick-strike rig was responsible for catching one of the world's largest muskie. "The world record caught by Louie Spray back in 1949 was caught on a special harness rig that was basically a quick-set rig," said Dettloff. "He (Spray) tried to market it, but he was ahead of his time." How times have changed.
Clearly, as the results of Dettloff's study show, single-hook sucker rigs have no place on Ontario's precious muskie waters either.
Gord Ellis Fishing Editor Gord Ellis is fishing editor of Ontario OUT OF DOORS magazine, and also the outdoor columnist for the Thunder Bay Chronicle/Times News and a radio commentator.
